Prediction of Celine Naef [178th] vs Carole Monnet [250th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L L W
Form
W L W L W W L L W WHead-2-Head: Naef 1 - 0 Monnet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Monnet winning 0. The last match between Naef and Monnet was at the W50 Nantes, 31-10-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Celine Naef | 1 |
| Carole Monnet | 0 |
| Naef | Stats | Monnet |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (8-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (4-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 178 | Ranking | 250 |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 162 |
| 19 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 8 |
| 65% (117-63) | Career Total W/L | 55% (249-200) |
| $220,512 | Career Prize Money | $162,327 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Carole Monnet
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:0:0 | Average Match Time | 1:0:0 |
| 65% (28/43) | 1st Serve % | 72% (34/47) |
| 71% (20/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (18/34) |
| 67% (10/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 8% (1/13) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 60% (28/47) | Return Points Win % | 30% (13/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Celine Naef vs Carole Monnet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naef 1 - 0 Monnet
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naef has won 40.7% of points on their second serve, while Monnet has won 41.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naef, in recent form, has won 45.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Monnet has won 49.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.26% and 35.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naef has saved 45.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Monnet has saved 44.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naef has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 33/ 24), with Monnet winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 70/ 26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Monnet has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 105/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 19/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18), where as Monnet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 22/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naef winning 1 times and Monnet being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Monnet winning 0. The last match between Naef and Monnet was at the W50 Nantes, 31-10-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naef and Monnet have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naef winning 0 times and Monnet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naef winning 0, and Monnet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 249.65 while Monnet has played against players with an average rank of 250.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naef has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Monnet has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naef has converted 35.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Monnet has converted 36.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Celine Naef vs Carole Monnet Best Odds For The Match
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Ella Seidel
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Linda Klimovicova
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Lian Tran
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Carole Monnet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Carole Monnet
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Carole Monnet
65%
(
81 of
124)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
49%
(
61 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
53 of
95)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Renata Jamrichova
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Darja Semenistaja
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Carole Monnet
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
11
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
95
|
0-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Xiaodi You
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
117)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
60 of
117)
121
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Carole Monnet
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
105
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Dayana Yastremska
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Naef vs Monnet?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Naef Vs Monnet is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (117/63) | Win/Loss | 55% (249/200) |
| 62% (259/161) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (556/449) |
| 55% (2117/1732) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4752/4249) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 521 | Aces Total | 497 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.54 |
| 388 | Total Double Faults | 2351 |
| 1:35:50 | Average Match Time | 1:32:16 |
| 251.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 309.74 |
| 60% (7400/12291) | 1st Serve % | 64% (17678/27628) |
| 64% (4759/7400) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (10515/17678) |
| 49% (2387/4891) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4245/9950) |
| 50% (779/1556) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1900/3761) |
| 46% (5704/12338) | Return Points Win % | 49% (13307/27329) |
| 65% (117/180) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (241/429) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 60% (21/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (35/72) |
| 58% (35/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (59/122) |
| 87% (109/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (256/212) |
| 13% (109/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (256/43) |
| 31% (71/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (192/37) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Carole Monnet
View full predicted draw for Monnet
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
